The Sidebar ~ Scenes from inside the El Paso County courts

Archive for the 'juan vasquez' Tag

Vasquez gets 56 years for killing two teens

March 24th, 2011, 9:03 am by

UPDATE: THE JUDGE HAS JUST SENTENCED JUAN VASQUEZ TO 56 YEARS IN PRISON.

STAY TUNED TO GAZETTE.COM FOR DETAILS AND THE STORY.

Good morning court watchers,

This is John Ensslin, legal affairs reporter for the Gazette, coming to you live this morning from a courtroom where Juan Manuel Vasquez is about to be sentenced for killing two teenagers during a brawl in Eastridge Park.

On Jan.14, a jury found Vasquez, 21, guilty of second-degree murder in the Jan. 8, 2009 shooting deaths of Uriel Rascon, 18, and Luis Burciaga, 17.

Prosecutors had sought a first-degree murder verdict, arguing that Vasquez brought a semiautomatic rifle to what everyone else thought was a fist-fight.

Vasquez’ defense attorney Bill Griffin countered that his client acted in self-defense after seeing his girlfriend get punched in the head during the melee.

The jurors concluded that Vasquez, “acted upon provoked passion” when he killed the two men with an SKS rifle.

Judge Timothy Schutz tells the packed courtroom that he expects everyone to act in a professional manner. He tells them to address their remarks to him, not to others in the courtroom.

The room is so crowded that a group of spectators are standing in a tight group between the seats.

The first witness in the hearing is El Paso County Sheriff’s Investigator Ralph Losasso, who was the lead detective in the case.

Losasso describes how the initial investigation yielded information that the shooter was someone named “Scrappy.” That led investigators to Vasquez.

Losasso tells the judge about an earlier incident in August 2008 in which Vasquez was shot in the leg during a confrontation with a carload of teenagers outside his family’s house.

Vasquez was not charged in that incident.

Next up, friends and relatives of the two victims speak.

The aunt of Luis Burciaga addresses the judge through a Spanish interpreter.

“Whatever happens here is not going to be enough to address the loss,” she says.

“He (Luis) was a beautiful person. He was very affectionate,” she adds.

A woman in the front row begins to cry.

Next, Burciaga’s mom’s talks to the judge. She asks him to impose the maximum sentence of 64 years.

“Today we come to ask for justice for my son’s death,” she said through the interpreter.

“Luis’ death was the hardest blow I have recieved in my life,” she said.

“Luis was my companion,” she continued. ” He was the one who when I woke up in the morning, he would brighten up my morning.”

“He was always singing and dancing and always laughing,” she said.

He would not want to see his mother cry, she added, as she began to do just that.

“I’ve been crying for two years,” she said. “Luis’ death has left me empty and hollow.”

“I will never see Luis get married and have children,” she sobbed. “For him to be accomplished as a person.”

“While some laugh, we cry.”

On January 8, 2009, Juan Vasquez acted, “like he was the most macho man in the world,” she said.

“He had no pity, so why should he ask for pity now?” she asked.

The defense begins to present witnesses on Vasquez’ behalf.

Chris Vasquez is the first to speak from his family.

“I know what he did was wrong,” the defendant’s brother said.

But he described Vasquez as a loving brother who always took time to help Chris with his homework and enabled him to graduate high school on time.

Another relative, a woman named Marta speaks to the judge. (Note to readers: I couldn’t catch her last name. I’ll fill in that detail later.)

“As a family, we feel very sorry for what happened,” she said. “But I do know that Juan is not a violent person.”

“We all believe in one God, a God who speaks about love and mercy,” she added.

She asks for mercy for Juan Vasquez.

“I’m sorry about these young men,” she says of the two victims. “I’m a mother. It hurts me.”

She asks the judge to consider a sentence closer to the minimum of 20 years.

Juan Vasquez’ father speaks to the judge.

“I’m very sorry for what happened,” the father said.

He noted the pain his son has caused the Burciaga and Rascon families.

“We are suffered very much, as they are,” he said.

“He (his son) has to face the consequence.”

“I don’t know what happened in the park that day,” he added. “What happened,happened.”

Juan Vasquez now addresses the judge.

“I’m very sorry for what I did,” he said through sobs.

The judge asks him to speak up so that everyone in the room can hear Vasquez.

“I want to apologize…for what I’ve done,” Vasquez added.

Senior Deputy District Attorney Jim Bently is now making his argument for why Vasquez should receive the maximum sentence.

He reminds the judge that Vasquez was the only person to bring a gun to what was supposed to be a fist fight.

Schutz asks the prosecutor if he believes the defendant’s age should be a factor in the sentence. Vasquez was 19 at the time of the shooting.

Bentley said he doesn’t thing it should because of the way Vasquez presented himself in the park that day, noting that the shooting took place during a gang confrontation.

“He made plans to take a gun there, judge,” Bentley said.

Defense attorney Bill Griffin makes his argument for Vasquez.

Griffin said he was grateful that the jury found his client acted in the heat of passion, which mitigated the potential punishment.

“I don’t envy your position,” Griffin told the judge, noting the wide range of possible sentences between 20 to 64 years.

Griffin said the judge’s sentence will decide whether or not Vasquez has the opportunity for a life or not.

It’s hard to ask for that opportunity, knowing that it’s not available to Rascon and Burciaga, Griffin said.

But he reminds the judge that Vasquez had been the victim of the earlier shooting and that there was evidence that his rifle was not the only weapon in the park that day.

“There was substantial evidence that there was a threat to the people he loved,” Griffin said.

Reaction to the Vasquez verdict

January 14th, 2011, 7:18 pm by

I wasn’t able to reach Juan Vasquez’ attorney Bill Griffin after today’s verdict, but here is what Senior Deputy District Attorney Jim Bentley said about the jury’s finding of guilty on two counts of second-degree homicide.

YouTube Preview Image

Bentley also had some interesting things to say when I asked him about the initial report by investigators that the fatal brawl was sparked by a dispute over a stolen iPod. Here is his comment:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dZ87Q-meTs

Vasquez guilty of second-degree murder

January 14th, 2011, 1:13 pm by

Juan Manuel Vasquez conferring with his attorney Bill Griffin on Jan. 12. Gazette photo by Bryan Oller.

A jury today found Juan Manuel Vasquez, 21, guilty of two counts of second degree murder in the fatal shooting of two teenagers in Eastridge Park on Jan. 8, 2009.

Stay tuned to the Sidebar for video and other reaction to the verdict.

The Daily Docket

January 14th, 2011, 10:56 am by
YouTube Preview Image

Know of a court story I ought to be covering?  Let me know. My e-mail: john.ensslin@gazette.com

John C. Ensslin

Legal Affairs reporter

The Gazette

No verdict yet in Vasquez murder trial

January 13th, 2011, 5:13 pm by

Juan Manuel Vasquez conferring with his lawyer on Jan. 12. Gazette photo, Bryan Oller.

The jury in the first-degree murder trial of a man accused of killing two teenagers recessed without reaching a verdict after about 10 hours of deliberation. They will resume work on Friday.

Juan Manuel Vasquez, 21, is accused of killing Uriel Rascon, 18 and Luis Burciaga, 17, during a Jan. 8, 2009 confrontation involving several teenagers in Eastridge Park.

El Paso County Sheriff’s investigators said the shooting was set off by a chain of events that began the day before with the theft of a iPod from another teen at Sand Creek High School.

The jury began its deliberations late Wednesday afternoon. About two hours into their deliberations they asked Fourth Judicial District Judge Timothy J. Schutz for a definintion of the word “deliberation” as it applies to a person “acting with deliberation.”

Schutz referred them to the definition contained in the jury instructions.

Scenes from the Vasquez trial: prosecution’s rebuttal

January 12th, 2011, 10:03 pm by

Deputy District Attorney Jim Bentley. Gazette photo by Bryan Oller.

 

Most of the witnesses in the first-degree murder trial of Juan Manuel Vasquez gave similar accounts of what happened when a confrontation in Eastridge Park turned fatal, a prosecutor said.

“The only one who says anything substantially different is the defendant,” Deputy District Attorney Jim Bentley said during the prosecution’s rebuttal argument.

He also asked jurors to look beyond their feelings about the witnesses.

“The point here is not to ask you do you like these people,” Bentley said. “The question is what do you believe happened that day?”

Bentley countered the defense claim that Vasquez, 21, was reacting to a gang attack when he fired the two shots that killed Uriel Rascon, 18 and Luis Burciaga, 17.

He held up the striped polo shirt that Burciaga was wearing on the day he was shot to death.

“Does this look like what some gang guy be out there wearing or does it look like something your neighbor might be wearing when you come home?” Bentley asked.

He encouraged the jurors to pick up and handle the SKS rifle used to kill the two teens. He urged them to look through the scope and picture Vasquez looking through it at his targets.

“These things just don’t go off,” he said. “These things don’t load themselves.”

Bentley also rebutted the defense claim that Vasquez was affected by an earlier incident in which he was shot in the leg.

“The defendant makes a big deal…it’s just like the last time,” Bentley says in a skeptical tone. “He’s revisiting this nightmare. Is it a nightmare?”

Bentley also attacked the defense theory that there were multiple weapons displayed during the confrontation.

“Who is the only person who ever says that he saw more than one weapon?” the prosecutor asked. “The defendant.”

He also disputed the defense theory that Rascon had a set of studded brass knuckles in his hand when he was shot, rather than in his back pocket where they were found later.

Bentley asked the jurors if it’s credible to think that as the bullet ripped into Rascon’s chest, he had a presence of mind to think “Ooops. If they find this in my hand it isn’t going to look too good and stuffed the brass knuckles into his pocket.

He also disputed the claim that other weapons were involved.

“This is all the evidence,” he said, gesturing at the rifle and other items in the courtroom. “There’s no other brass knuckles. There’s no other weapon.”

Scenes from the Vasquez trial: the defense argument

January 12th, 2011, 8:32 pm by

Juan Manuel Vasquez (left) and his defense attorney Bill Griffin. Gazette photo by Bryan Oller.

 

Bill Griffin, defense attorney for Juan Manuel Vasquez, echoed the same theme that he used to start the first-degree murder trial.

“Just like the last time,” Griffin said. “There was someone he loved in imminent danger.”

The defense has argued that Vasquez, 21, fired his SKS semi-automatic rifle after his girlfriend Lisa Villaborghi had been punched in the head and was about to be hit again in Eastridge Park on Jan. 8, 2009.

Griffin acknowledged the pain and tragedy that was caused by the gunfire that killed Uriel Rascon, 18 and Luis Burciaga, 17 during a confrontation, allegedly sparked by the theft of an iPod from another teenager.

But he urged the jury not to let their sympathy for the victims’ families overshadow their decision of whether the shooting was a premeditated act of murder or self-defense.

“You’re job is not to bring back Uriel or Luis,” Griffin said. “Nothing that you do will change that.”

He also observed that some of the jurors might be wondering if it was right for a young man like Vasquez to be carrying such a gun.

“That’s not what you’re here to decide either,” he said.

He also asked the jury not to be swayed by the type of gun Vasquez fired. If he had used a .38 or .45 caliber handgun, the self-defense aspect of the case would still be the same, Griffin said.

“It just happens to be a big gun. The fact that it’s a big gun doesn’t change anything,” Griffin said. “That wasn’t going to change the fact of what he saw, that Lisa was about to be struck.”

Griffin then played back a segment of the videotaped interrogation that showed Vasquez speaking to El Paso County investigator Ralph Losasso.

“They hit my girl,” Vasquez said on the tape.

“Is that what set you off?” Losasso asked.

Vasquez nodded yes.

It’s interesting to note that prosecutors picked up the rifle three times during their closing arguments. Griffin instead picked up the set of studded brass knuckles that were recovered from Rascon’s back pocket.

He also held up a replica pellet gun that was found about 200 feet south of where the shooting occurred. Griffin suggested that the replica might have been the flash of silver that Vasquez claimed he saw before firing the second shot that killed Burciaga.

He noted that pellets were also found about 10 feet from the scene.

“That’s an amazing coincidence, but it’s not,” Griffin said. “Somebody had that gun.”

Griffin also disputed Senior Deputy District Attorney Jennifer Viehman’s argument that a set of brass knuckles didn’t justify gunfire.

“She’s wrong,” Griffin said, saying the brass knuckles were capable of causing serious injury.

He cited testimony by one neighbor who claimed she saw a gun at the scene. He also cited testimony by others who heard someone say, “go get the strap,” just before the shooting.

“That means go get the gun,” Griffin said.

Griffin said Vasquez also was influenced by a shooting in August 2008 when he was shot in the leg at his home.

“He was paranoid. He was nervous when he saw the same sort of situation develop,” Griffin said.

“Just like the last time, another gang coming at him,” Griffin added. “Another group of people that he didn’t know coming after him, coming after the one he loved.”

“Just like the last time…he did what he could to defend a loved one.”

Live from the Vasquez murder trial

January 12th, 2011, 1:14 pm by

Juan Manuel Vasquez confers with his defense attorney, Bill Griffin. Gazette photo by Bryan Oller.

Good afternoon court watchers,

This is John Ensslin, legal affairs reporter for the Gazette, coming to you live from Division 9 where closing arguments are about to begin in the first-degree murder trial of Juan Manuel Vasquez.

Vasquez, also known as “Scrappy”, is charged in the Jan. 8, 2009 shooting deaths of two teenagers during a confrontation in Eastridge Park.

Uriel Rascon, 18 and Luis Burciaga, 17, died in the incident, which El Paso County sheriff’s investigators said was sparked by the theft of another teen’s iPod.

During the trial, which began a week ago Monday, prosecutors asserted that Vasquez killed the two teens without provocation after bringing a semi-automatic SKS rifle to what was supposed to be a fist fight.

Defense attorneys conceded that Vasquez fired the two fatal shots but argued that he fired the rifle to protect his fiancée Lisa Villaborghi moments before one of the victims was about to hit her in the head with a set of skull-studded brass knuckles.

The jury has just entered the courtroom.

Fourth Judicial District Judge Timothy J. Schutz. Gazette photo by Bryan Oller.

Fourth Judicial District Judge Timothy J. Schutz is giving his instructions to the jury. This is the first murder trial that Schutz has presided over since being appointed to the bench late last year.

The small courtroom is packed with about 32 spectators. Several are listing via headsets to a spanish translator.

The judge has finished his instructions. Closing arguments are about to begin.

Senior Deputy District Attorney Jennifer Viehman begins by repeating the phrase she used in her opening argument.

“Everyone thought it was going to be a fist fight. Everyone except for one man. This man here” she said pointing to the defendant. “With this gun,” she said, holding the SKS rifle.

This time though the gun slips and lands on the courtroom floor as she puts it back down.

Viehman tackles the claim that Vasquez acted in self-defense.

“There are too many witnesses. What else is he going to do?” Viehman says. “Of course it has to be about defending his little girlfriend. Because he has no place else to go.”

Senior Deputy District Attorney Jennifer Viehman. Gazette photo by Bryan Oller.

She explains that the confrontation that day was a case of mutual combat: a pair of one-on-one fist fights.

Self-defense of others does not apply in that situation, she says.

None of the other witnesses report seeing a gun at the fight except for the rifle in Vasquez’s hands.

“Brass knuckles does not entitle you to shoot people,” she said. “And secondly, where are those brass knuckles?”

She shows the jurors a picture taken after the shooting that shows the brass knuckles stuck inside Rascon’s back pocket.

“This is not reasonable force. There is nothing reasonable about what he did,” Viehman says.

“He walked in and shot these two people for no reason,” she adds. “There is no reason for this. It is senseless and it is horrible.”

Viehman talks about how evasive Vasquez was later in an interview with a detective.

“There’s no remorse. This is not heartbreak over taking the lives of two people,” she tells the jury.

Court watchers, the battery on my computer is about to run out, so I’ll pause this blog here and resume it later this afternoon.

Also watch for the full story later today at gazette.com.

One trial ends, another begins

January 12th, 2011, 11:02 am by

Juan Manuel Vasquez

 

One first-degree murder trial draws to a close today while another is getting underway.

Closing arguments are expected at 1 p.m. today in the trial of Juan Manuel Vasquez, who is accused of shooting two teenagers to death during a confrontation in Eastridge Park on Jan. 8, 2009.

Investigators said the chain of events leading to the fight was sparked by the theft on an iPod from a Sand Creek High School student.

I’ll be live blogging the closing arguments and the verdict, so stay tuned to the Sidebar.

Meanwhile, jury selection is underway in the trial of Robert Hull Marko, the Fort Carson soldier accused of killing one woman and sexually assaulting another.

Marko has pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity. That trial is expected to last about four weeks.

The Daily Docket

January 12th, 2011, 9:42 am by
YouTube Preview Image

Know of a court case I should be covering? Let me know. My e-mail: john.ensslin@gazette.com

John C. Ensslin

Legal Affairs reporter

The Gazette